Bookshelf

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Topical NSAIDs versus Opioids for Acute Musculoskeletal Pain: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2017 Jan 30.

<a href=Cover of Topical NSAIDs versus Opioids for Acute Musculoskeletal Pain: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness" width="80px" height="100px" />

Topical NSAIDs versus Opioids for Acute Musculoskeletal Pain: A Review of the Clinical Effectiveness [Internet].

Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2017 Jan 30.

Table 3 SIGN Checklist –Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Internal ValidityDerry et al., 2015 10 Van den Bekerom et al., 2015 12 Pattanittum et al., 2013 11
1. The research question is clearly defined and the inclusion/exclusion criteria must be listed in the paperYesYesYes
2. A comprehensive literature search is carried outYesYesYes
3. At least two people should have selected studiesYesYesYes
4. At least two people should have extracted dataYesYesYes
5. The status of publication was not used as an inclusion criteriaYesYesYes
6. The excluded studies are listedYesNoYes
7. The relevant characteristics of the included studies are providedYesYesYes
8. The scientific quality of the included studies was assessed and reportedYesYesYes
9. Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately?YesYesYes
10. Appropriate methods are used to combine the individual study findingsYesYesYes
11. The likelihood of publication bias was assessed appropriatelyYesNoNo
12. Conflicts of interest are declaredYesYesYes
Overall Assessment of the Study
High, Moderate, LowHighHighHigh

For overall assessment of the study: High indicated that all or most criteria have been fulfilled; where they have not been fulfilled, the conclusions of the study or review are thought very unlikely to alter. Moderate indicates that some of the criteria have been fulfilled; those criteria that have not been fulfilled or not adequately described are thought unlikely to alter the conclusions. Low indicates that few or no criteria fulfilled; the conclusions of the study are thought likely or very likely to alter.

Copyright © 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

Copyright: This report contains CADTH copyright material. It may be copied and used for non-commercial purposes, provided that attribution is given to CADTH.

Links: This report may contain links to other information available on the websites of third parties on the Internet. CADTH does not have control over the content of such sites. Use of third party sites is governed by the owners’ own terms and conditions.